News Article

E-Bike Importers Collective Annoyed With EU E-Bike Anti-Dumping Video

Laws & Regulations 1274

BRUSSELS, Belgium – Last Wednesday, the Collective of European E-bike Importers of attended a second hearing with the European Commission. This was aimed at discussing the lack of response from the Commission on the Collective’s submissions so far. However, the Commission also showed a video which raised eyebrows among the members of the Collective.

E-Bike Importers Collective Annoyed With EU E-Bike Anti-Dumping Video
The Swedish MEP Christofer Fjellner explains in the video why anti-dumping legislation needs some changes. – Photo European Parliament

During the hearing, the Collective showed the Commission a video produced by the European Parliament. The video is meant to clarify why anti-dumping legislation needs some changes addressed by the Swedish MEP Christofer Fjellner. However, the topic is being introduced by referring to the e-bike case. This is a transcript of the introduction: “Electric bikes are powering their way across Europe. Increasingly popular, the bikes are also at the centre of an international trade dispute. At the heart of the matter is dumping; a practice that involves foreign companies selling their state-subsidized products at below market price. In this case, Chinese made electric bikes are being sold cheap in Europe, which the EU believes threatens businesses and jobs.”

 

Legal action

The Collective states that, “this video is implying that the European Parliament has made up its mind about an ongoing proceeding. This is to, put it mildly, totally unacceptable and goes once again against the Collective’s right of defence. Obviously, we will take the necessary legal actions. However, this video shows that, in this alleged dumping case, political considerations seem to carry more weight than a fair and just assessment of facts.”

‘Already guilty’

“The Collective Members believe it is utterly unfair to have to endure, what they consider punishments, whilst not yet been ‘found guilty’. One importer concluded: ‘We are hit by the results of the trial before the trial is completed. That is not the correct procedure.’”

Eleven of the 21 companies in the Collective travelled to Brussels to participate in the hearing. Each of them gave a detailed report on how the registration decision has injured their company in several ways. According to the Collective’s statement, “the Registration Regulation has caused enormous chaos and has forced importers to take a variety of measures to try and protect themselves against a potential retroactive collection of 189% duties. However, all these measures are causing injury to their companies.”

Comment on this article