News Article

UCI Confirms Partnership with Bike Industry

Industry- & Retail Organizations

BERN, Switzerland – In an official statement the UCI confirmed that it is unquestionable that there are many advantages for the UCI to work directly the World Federation of the Sporting Goods Industry (WFSGI) as representative of the international bicycle industry.

UCI Confirms Partnership with Bike Industry
UCI and the WFSGI underline that they move forward together on equipment rules and regulations.

UCI’s response follows media coverage of the consequences for the bike industry of a possible demise of the International Cycling Union (UCI). The future of the UCI was questioned in the aftermath of the Armstrong affair.

UCI approval processes
Within the World Federation, the WFSGI Bicycle Committees are the relation for the industry towards the UCI and this year most attention was addressed to the UCI frame and fork approval process, the wheel approval process, the rule explanations, the Olympic Games and the work process between the organizations in general.

Both the UCI and the WFSGI underline that: “We can only move forward on equipment rules and regulations by collaborating together.”

“When it comes to the Armstrong affair, the WFSGI takes since many years a firm position to condemn doping and unethical behavior and all our brands follow this line of conduct that is reflected in their contracts with athletes and teams,” notes the WFSGI.

WFSGI supports UCI
WFSGI Secretary General, Robbert de Kock, says: “As a direct consequence of the Armstrong affair we have to make sure that the bicycle sport can continue to develop and here we see no other role than to continue to support the UCI in this project.

“High level discussions are in preparation to further discuss the development of the cycling sport and its equipment. Today we can be fortunate that the bicycle industry is much more than professional racing and we see therefore only a very limited influence in sales caused by the Armstrong affair. Cycling today is sport, leisure and transportation and this will continue despite the unfortunate problems around doping.”

Punish cycling
De Kock continues: “A further concern for the future is to secure the support of cycling by governments by investing in infrastructures which is essential to further develop cycling on a large scale (transport, leisure and sport). Will governments punish cycling sport due to the negative messages and reduce their possible investment of public money in activities which draw negative attention each time again? The WFSGI urges all cycling associations to lobby and secure that this de-investment will not take place.”

Comment on this article