News Article

European Companies Request for Review of Imposition of E-Bike Dumping Duties

Laws & Regulations

BRUSSELS, Belgium – Today, the EU member state representatives in the Trade Defence Instruments Committee are meeting to give their final judgment on the European Commission’s proposal to impose up to 79.3% duties on import of electric bicycles from China. Last week, in the run-up to this meeting, LEVA-EU reported that a letter has been sent to Trade Commissioner Malmström that has been signed by 87 European companies that are active in the E-bike sector, requesting for a review of the European Commission’s intentions.

European Companies Request for Review of Imposition of E-Bike Dumping Duties
In a letter 87 EU companies warn that final dumping duties will have ‘immensely negative effect on the whole European e-bike sector.’ – Photo Shutterstock

According to LEVA-EU no less than 60 European SMEs from 13 different EU member states have sent this motivated request to Trade Commissioner Malmström. This request is being supported by another 27 European companies that are active in the E-bike sector but don’t import electric bicycles from China. They are European producers of components, accessories, LEVs other than e-bikes, but also distributors, dealers and service providers. All 87 European signatories together employ 1,419 people. LEVA-EU says “The letter has received further support from non-European companies active in the e-bike sector as well as from Chinese e-bike assemblers. The signatories’ list holds a total of 176 names but is confidential.”

‘Extremely severe punishment’

In the letter, the importing companies explain why the Commissioner should review the Commission’s intention to impose up to 79.3% duties on import of electric bicycles from China. The 60 importers label this plan as “an extremely severe punishment for unsubstantiated dumping allegations”. They argue that dumping measures must always be founded upon three pillars: dumping on the EU market, injury to the EU producers and a causal link between the two. “The most important argument for this request to Commissioner Malmström is the fact that the Commission has been unable to establish injury.” LEVA-EU claims that the Commission itself has established economic performance indicators, which show that the EU producers are fit and healthy.”

Furthermore it is claimed that “The only extremely weak argument for the Commission to claim injury is the fact that the industry profitability was 3.4% in the investigation period (Sept. ’16 – Sept. ’17), whilst the Commission feels it should be 4.3% as it was in 2015.”

‘Immensely negative effect’

LEVA-EU further reports that “The group warns the Commissioner that final duties will have an immensely negative effect on the whole European e-bike sector. Therefore, they call upon her to reconsider the proposed measures, which will only be for the benefit of a handful of EU companies “who are abusing a trade defence instrument to disturb the market and upset competition”.

As said, today the EU member state representatives in the Trade Defence Instruments Committee will meet to give their final judgment on the Commission’s proposal. These representatives have also received the review request from the 60 SMEs.

‘Examination procedure’

LEVA-EU explains that “The decision of the Committee on final measures comes under the examination procedure. This means that the committee’s opinion is delivered by a qualified majority (55% of member states representing at least 65% of EU population). All aspects of this Committee’s meetings are confidential.”

Furthermore LEVA-EU stipulates “This letter marks the final effort of the Collective of European Importers of Electric Bicycles supported by LEVA-EU to fight the Commission’s proposal for the imposition of dumping duties. The Collective will now await the Commission’s final decision, announced for January 2019, upon which they will confer on potential further actions.”

Comment on this article